Well let's run down some of Kron's contentions shall we
The amendation of treaties through the Senate seems like a fairly obvious fix too, although again I'd argue that explicitly stating that is not as necessary as Kron might have expressed if only for the sheer illogical nature of the concept. Regardless, might as well clearly express that all treaties are ratifiable only and not capable of being amended through the Senate(although to be entirely honest I'd argue that treaties as a whole should go straight to a referendum and completely bypass the Senate)
President no longer being explicitly commander-in-chief and instead being split is kind of meh in my honest opinion. Regional security, I'd argue, is already split in an OOC context, and splitting it in an IC context is sensible. However, if I am reading Glac correctly in his argument, the President still holds the role of Commander-in-Chief
Anywho, I've laid out a response to the points that I felt were genuinely capable of being contentious towards anyone other than Glac, but most of what I read in the #senate-chamber felt like more of a personal disagreement between Kron and Glaciosia and I will therefore cede the floor to him with any more of his arguments he may have the desire to present.
Considering this will be sent to a citizen referendum, I am relatively neutral about its potential(and likely eventual) passage here. I do urge all the citizens to do their own reading and interpretations in a manner as Kron did and to come to their own conclusions, as either this Amended article or the current composition will suit our region fine in my personal opinion.
Alright so let's just run down this part of it in order. 1 & 2 are fair enough contentions, although I'd argue that you could always recall either or despite the verbiage stating "and." Making that clause an and/or is fairly easy though and a pretty simple enough fix.
The amendation of treaties through the Senate seems like a fairly obvious fix too, although again I'd argue that explicitly stating that is not as necessary as Kron might have expressed if only for the sheer illogical nature of the concept. Regardless, might as well clearly express that all treaties are ratifiable only and not capable of being amended through the Senate(although to be entirely honest I'd argue that treaties as a whole should go straight to a referendum and completely bypass the Senate)
President no longer being explicitly commander-in-chief and instead being split is kind of meh in my honest opinion. Regional security, I'd argue, is already split in an OOC context, and splitting it in an IC context is sensible. However, if I am reading Glac correctly in his argument, the President still holds the role of Commander-in-Chief
Anywho, I've laid out a response to the points that I felt were genuinely capable of being contentious towards anyone other than Glac, but most of what I read in the #senate-chamber felt like more of a personal disagreement between Kron and Glaciosia and I will therefore cede the floor to him with any more of his arguments he may have the desire to present.
Considering this will be sent to a citizen referendum, I am relatively neutral about its potential(and likely eventual) passage here. I do urge all the citizens to do their own reading and interpretations in a manner as Kron did and to come to their own conclusions, as either this Amended article or the current composition will suit our region fine in my personal opinion.
